Similarities and differences between the Scottish consensus and the sayings of the Companion, a comparative study

The research aims to study the reality of the silent consensus, the statement of the companion, the extent to which they are invoked, and the similarities and differences between them. The study concluded that the silent consensus is a reliable evidence and it is the correct one from the sayings of the scholars. Likewise, it became clear to the researcher that the scholars differed in the statement of who is the companion to whom this honorable title is approved by sayings. The study examined the similarities and differences between these two evidence, and it appeared to the researcher that there is a similarity between them in matters including: what the name is located on, in terms of the origin of the evidence, in terms of invoking it, in terms of the type of inferred, and in terms of the inferred, and the absence of the violator in Age, and their presence in the books of assets, and in terms of jurisprudential impact, and do they take precedence over analogy? Also, it appeared to the researcher that there are differences between them, including: prevalence and its absence, the condition of the age, the time to invoke it, and the ruling against it, and God knows best.