Stopping in the interpretation of the predecessors

This research dealt with one of the issues related to the science of interpretation, which is the issue of stopping the interpretation of the predecessors.
The research included an introduction, a preface two chapters and conclusion. The preface includes the definition of stopping and its legitimacy in interpretation and what is meant by the predecessors, then the first chapter, which is on the interpretive stopping of the predecessors, and it includes:
The first requirement; the predecessors stopped speaking in interpretation. The second requirement; the method of the predecessors stopped speaking in interpretation. Then the second topic, which includes the verses that the predecessors stopped in interpretation.
The method followed in this research is the inductive method which is to track and list the sayings and pauses of the predecessors in interpretation then the analytical method which is to interpret among predecessors and to clarify their method in that .
Among the most important results of this research it became clear that the method of the predecessors in stopping in interpretation and one of the features of this approach: stopping in interpreting what they don’t know, interpreting the verses that need to explain the judgment of God Almighty, but there is no judgement in it, they stop saying in their opinions, stop interpreting what isn’t useful to know its interpretation, stop explaining; because they are far from being affected by it.
The number of verses which the predecessors stopped interpreting reached about eleven issues.