Reconciliation against compensation in felonies

Abdel Rahim, Mortada Abdel Rahim Mohamed Abdel Rahim

doi:10.21608/bfda.2022.250079

Reconciliation against compensation in felonies "A comparative jurisprudence study".

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Mortada Abdel Rahim Mohamed Abdel Rahim Abdel Rahim

Assistant Professor of Comparative Jurisprudence Faculty of Islamic and Arabic Studies for Girls in Sohag Al-Azhar University

10.21608/bfda.2022.250079

Abstract

This study aimed to clarify the provisions of conciliation against compensation in felonies from the point of view of Islamic jurisprudence, as it highlights the definition of conciliation, its ruling and its types.
This study came in an introduction entitled: Introducing the vocabulary of the research title (Reconciliation - felony – compensation) and the related vocabulary
(Arbitration - Forgiveness - Remittal), the concept of reconciliation, its legality and its types.
As for the first topic, it came in the provisions of reconciliation against compensation in felonies, and it contains four demands: what is suitable to be a compensation for reconciliation in felonies, its type and amount, reconciliation for retribution by more than blood money, and reconciliation against more than blood money in wrongful killing, and reconciliation for the right of the young or the insane or the lunatic, and the second topic: Exaggeration in reconciliation against compensation in felonies. Which contains two demands: determining the conciliation substitute to a certain limit, and Exaggeration in the conciliation against compensation in felonies, and finally the third topic in the effects of conciliation against compensation in felonies, and it contains three demands: Who must compensate in conciliation in felonies, and if the killer is unable to provide the conciliation substitute, what is the ruling? And the rule of denial of what was termed.

Keywords