Contrasting semantics of narrations when rejecting the Imamate as a model

Praise be to God and prayers be upon the Messenger of God. As for what follows: This research, which is tagged with: (Contradicting the indications of the narratives of the Shiites - the Imamate as a model) examines one of the most important issues of refuting the doctrine of the Shiites, where the light was shed on the statement of the contradiction in the narratives of the Shiites on which they relied in proving The Imamate, by mentioning their conflicting narratives on the issue of Imamate, which is considered the most important doctrinal issues for them, rather it is the course of the religion. The name of the imam or his announcement, and another topic related to the statement of the conflicting indications of the narrations in determining the name of the imam, and I included it by mentioning the conflict of their statements on this issue in two essential points, namely their opposition to the text on the imam or not, and their conflict in determining who is the imam, and one of the most important topics that he was exposed to The research is a statement of the conflicting indications of the Rafidah narrations at the time of the emergence of the imam. Ten, and the conclusion of the investigations presented by the research is a statement of the conflicting indications of the Rafidah narrations in the number of imams. Was the text proven to be one imam or more than that? Finally, she concluded with a conclusion in which she mentioned the most important research findings related to this topic, in which she explained the disorder of the Rafidi doctrine based on false narratives transmitted in their books, and for this the research can express (contradictory of the Rafidah - the contradiction of the narratives of the Rafidah).