Hadith: (The pen was raised from three) - fundamentalist study -

The hadeeth “The pen was raised from three: from the sleeper until he wakes up, and from the young until he is occupied, and from the insane until he is reasonable”, the scholars received it by acceptance and work on jurisprudence. Fundamentalism differed in the significance of the hadith, is it a total, and what is more and what is more correct is that it is not complete, and that lifting the pen here is a metaphor for non -assignment, or it is intended to raise the pen in fact, and what is meant by the pen is: the pen that God created at the beginning of creation for business books. Those who said that the hadith is not total in estimating its significance in two ways: raising the sin and punishment only, but the guarantee does not have to be raised, because it is related to the guardian, and it is costly, as the three related to the malecom speech; Rather, the situation of the situation, and this is more correct. Raise all legal rulings, and the consequent sin and punishment. And both methods are agreed to raise the sin, whether to leave a duty or a forbidden act. The reason for lifting the mandate for the boy, the sleeper and the crazy is: the intention. The disagreement with Abu Hanifa in the necessity of zakat in the money of the boy and the madman, that the zakat is repeated between its worship, so it is not obligatory for them, because they are not assigned to them, or that it is a financial supply, so it is obligatory in their money, such as the expense of relatives and wives. It is true that the boy is not costly, but he is rewarded for the act of delegates and the kneeling of the mud. The addressee of the boy is the guardian, not the boy, so he must order his boys to pray when they reach seven years. God Almighty did not cost His servants with anything from what happened to them in their dreams unanimously. The correct one in the assignment of the unconscious is that he is absolutely not eliminated for the worship that he missed and is unconscious. Negative among the fundamentalists in the chapter of assignment and the symptoms of eligibility, the absence of negligence among the fundamentalists in the chapter of the narrator’s conditions, and its meaning in the chapter of the narrator’s conditions is close to its meaning with the jurists or identical. It is true that the crazy, the fool and the inattentive do not eliminate the missed acts of worship at all.