Combining the case - Applied Fundamental Study -

The topic of research: The topic of conflict and weighting is one of the most important fundamentalist investigations, and the fundamentalists have been concerned with studying the methods of pushing the conflict, the most prominent of which is the combination of the two conflicts. And the combination of contradictory texts and your questionnaires, including the plural in the different situation, which is a strong amusement; It was not related to more study; Rather, it is included in the words on the Savior of the conflict, or ways to pay the conflict, specifically the plural; Perhaps the reason for this is that one of the other types of gathering was unique in its investigations in its views, such as the plural of allocation, restriction, etc. And the plural, according to the case, may interfere with other types of plural, such as the plural, according to the store or the wisdom, so is there a difference between them? And if is it influential? It is the importance of the plural, according to the case, that its jurisprudential applications are many, and are spread in the books of scholars. Through jurisprudential applications, it appears to us two issues: The first is the multiplicity of types of combination in one issue, so is it multiple support or contradiction? As for the second, it is the multiplicity of ways to pay the conflict in the same matter, and sometimes from the owners of the doctrine itself, so what is the effect of that? As for the multiplicity of types of combination in one example, it is most likely a multiplicity of support and not influencing the adaptation of the jurisprudential result, as well as the multiplicity of the probe in the same matter.