Measuring similarities and its effect on legal rulings

Measuring the likeness of the mysterious measure, which needs to be clarified and explained, so that the fundamentalists did not agree on a specific definition of it, and their lack of agreement led to their difference in its authenticity, between those who see it as an argument, and whoever sees that it is not an argument, and the research has shown the dispute with evidence Each team and the most correct opinion. And those who say it differed in the type of similarity between the origin and the branch, is it my wise? Or my photos? Or are they together? Then they differed in determining his terms, some of whom saw that he was the required for the occasion, and some of them saw that he was the one who hesitated between two origins, and he attached him to the most like it. And the research is the applied examples of this measurement, the difference between similarities and expulsion, between similarities and ideals, and between measuring similarities and measuring the meaning, and the relationship of similarities to the semantic. In conclusion, the fundamentalists differed in measuring the dominance of the likeness, is it a type of similarity? Or independent about him? The correct view is a type of similarity.