Wounded peers "Ibn Mandah and Abu Naim as a model"

The research dealt with the sections of the speech of the peers and made it clear that it is of two types: true and false speech, and each of them is of two types: soft speech and harsh speech. Among the reasons for their speech in some of its reasons, they are summarized in four reasons: jealousy and competition, the nature of human beings, and no one was spared from slander, the doctrinal disputes that necessitate resentment, and the difference of ijtihad with fanaticism and unfairness. He answered the question: Is the wound from backbiting? He explained the scholars’ approach to that. He set off the dispute between Ibn Mandah and Abu Naim. He nullified the accusations that Abu Naim had been called when he was described as (Ash’ari and Shi’ism). The difference is the right of every person if he has evidence and evidence, and he has a reward if he strives and errs, and two rewards if he strives and is right, but unity of the row and meeting the word is an international duty, and one of the requirements of wisdom is to advance the interests of society, and consider its reform as reform of individuals without the opposite. And that the scholars do not envy in the reprehensible and reprehensible sense, even if a kind of rivalry arises between them, which may lead to a little bit of envy, resulting in bad words and a departure from the path. Among the most important recommendations reached by the research: - Taking care of editing the differences between the distinguished men of hadith. - List those differences and conclude their causes. Putting practical steps to address the causes of differences.