Negative judgment pictures

The negative judicial judgment, although in some cases it does not decide on the subject matter of the case due to circumstances related to the case, the plaintiff or the defendant, the decision issued by it is considered a judicial judgment. Between pronunciation and meaning, identifying the utterance of the negative judicial judgment, the validity and enforceability of the negative judicial judgment, the interpretation of the negative judicial judgment, and the controls of the negative judicial judgment. The research used the comparative rooting method. And the research reached to the forms of negative judicial judgment, including: dividing judgments into two types in terms of confrontation (presence judgments - judgments in absentia), in terms of the extent to which they are acceptable to appeal, judgments are divided into primary judgments, and final judgments). Authenticity, because in it the judicial truth is represented, but it is required to prove the authenticity of the thing in which the judgment is based on what is stated in the judgment’s utterance that it has been stated in the form of judgment and separation as a result of research and balance. During it, it can be said that the judgment is negative, and if the negative judicial ruling includes denying something about something, preventing it from doing something, or leaving it. The source of the negative judicial ruling may be due to the judge’s inability to consider the case in the absence of jurisdiction as a source of the negative judicial ruling, and the lack of The judge’s authority as a source of negative judicial judgment. The negative judicial judgment acquires validity as soon as it is issued, and this authenticity is represented in its enjoyment of a kind of inviolability, whether the judicial judgment is in presence or in absentia, primary or final.